thanks for being with us. "the last word with lawrence o'donnell" starts right now. i'm chris hayes in for lawrence o'donnell. in england, it's the end of the world as we know it. in washington, it's business as usual. th >> the end of the news of the world. >> we're in the end game here. >> this is the start of the conversation rather than the end of it the conversation. >> the beginning of the end in washington. >> president obama met with congressional leadership. >> constructive and productive meeting. >> a consider constructive meeting. >> constructive -- >> meeting. >> there must be a real negotiation going on. >> the president goes big, surprising his base and republicans. >> the president is considering major changes in social security and medicare. >> he is willing to put sacred cows on the table. >> the american people didn't send us here to wage symbolic battles.

>> the white house is winning the politics here. >> republicans and democrats are not sold yet. >> house democrats are not supporting any cuts in benefits for social security or medicare. >> tax hikes are off the table. >> the democrats in congress will not balance the budget on the backs of social security beneficiaries. >> we're not for raising taxes. >> but eventually, republicans are going to have to agree toing? . -- to something. >> i will not vote to increase the debt ceiling. >> it's insanity. >> i will reconvene congressional leaders here on sunday. >> meeting again on sunday. >> they are going to come back here sunday. >> and sunday is also the end of rupert murdoch's best-selling paper. >> the end of "news of the world." >> closing on sunday after 168 years. >> all of the things that people have talked about, this is an evil empire. >> phone hacking scandal. >> this is disgusting, disgracef disgraceful. >> they are closing the paper in name.

they are expanding the publications. >> just how low will a tabloid go? >> british tabloid "news of the world" announced it will publish its final issue sunday. >> don't you mean the rebranding of "news of the world"? >> good evening from los angeles. today, with the clock ticking down in a crisis with serious economic ramifications looming, president obama called congressional leaders to the white house to try and walk republicans back from the ledge. after the meeting, the president went to the press room to provide some insight into the chance of a looming crisis actually happening. >> we just had a productive meeting. we discussed the impasse that we're currently at, with respect to the budget, and i thought the meetings were frank, they were constructive, and what they did was narrow the issues, and clarify the issues, that are still outstanding. i remain confident that if we're

serious about getting something done, we should be able to complete a deal and get it passed and avert a shutdown. >> no, wait. that's actually the wrong tape. that's what the president said during the last 11th hour showdown in april, but it sounds pretty much like what he said today. >> i just completed a meeting with all the congressional leaders from both chambers. from both parties. and i have to say that i thought it was a very constructive meeting. people were frank. we discussed the various options available to us. everybody reconfirmed the importance of completing our work and raising the debt limit ceiling so that the full faith and credit of the united states of america is not impaired. >> this is the new normal, of course. welcome to the boehner era. republicans have decided they

won't negotiate without one hand on the detonator. let's remember because it cannot be said enough what's happening now is not what we think of traditionally as negotiating, a little of this, a little of that, nobody gets everything but everybody gets something. what the republicans are demanding is that the democratic president and the democratic-led senate adopt the grover norquist position on taxes, which is no net tax revenue increase whatsoever, at all, full stop. this is an extreme right-wing position far beyond the bounds of normal american politics over the last several decades and now not only the dominating principle of the conservative movement, and the republican congress, but if a deal is made on these terms, the official governing principle of the democratic president of the united states. and don't be fooled because some republicans are maybe, sort of kind of sounding like they are open to ending some tax breaks or subsidies, but they are still asking for an equal tax break somewhere else offsetting, thus the impact on the bottom line number would be zero, which means to get to x trillion would

require more cuts. keep in mind tax revenue as a percentage of gdp is at a 60-year low. just look at what's happened over the past 20 years. tax revenues went up steadily in the 1990s and dropped sharply in the last decade. speaking to the media after the meeting, house democratic leader nancy pelosi seemed like she couldn't quite believe it's come to this. >> does he call it a grand bargain? however the president represents it, i want him to have the room to do that, and offer full cooperation to do that. i also want to have full clarity about where house democrats stand. we do not support cuts and benefits for social security and medicare. let me say this one further comment. the debate on a budget is a traditionally controversial measure. it is a different value system that we bring to the table, different priorities.

and so it is of its nature partisan. whether we -- it should not be partisan as to whether we will honor the full faith and credit of the united states government. so it's unfortunate that these two issues have come together in this way. >> joining me now is maryland congressman steny hoyer, the house democratic whip. reports indicate that the democratic caucus was taken aback by the reports that the president is seeking a $4 trillion deal and that medicaid and social security are on the table. were you and your colleagues caught offguard? >> i don't know if we were caught offguard. i think the caucus is clearly concerned about, a, getting the debt limit so that we don't default on america's bills. and we stabilize the economy and continue to grow the economy. and we are also very focused on making sure that medicare

beneficiaries and social security beneficiaries are not adversely affected. we do want to see the deficit brought down and the debt addressed. but i think they want to have assurances that social security recipients and medicare recipients will be unharmed by any effort that we make. but i think they understand that we've got to work all focus on the fact that in a very short period of time, america is not going to be able to pay its bills, and that will have a very bad consequence on everybody's pension funds, on homeowners interest rates, on consumer interest rates. it will not be something that will be beneficial to our country. and very damaging to our economy. so we're very focused on that, and we're going to work towards that end. as you know, we met with the president today, and we're going to meet again on sunday. >> congressman, let me ask you. you just said that you want assurances that recipients of social security and medicare

will be unharmed. i wonder what do you -- what does unharmed mean to you? what is the point after which you cannot abide? >> well, look, i don't want to go into every possible eventuality that might occur, but i think it's clear what unharmed means, unharmed. not adversely affected. >> adversely affected, though, could mean a change in the computation of the cost of living increases in social security, that could amount for, say, $1,000 less in real terms per year. does that count as not adversely affected? >> well, you know, when i say unharmed, that would, i think, be an adverse effect, yes. and social security recipients now we think should not be adversely affected. so i think that's our position. it's a strong position. i think the president wants to make sure that doesn't happen as well.

>> let me ask you what kind of leverage your caucus has. obviously, you're in the minority in the house. it looks like this deal is largely being negotiated, the principles are speaker john boehner and the president of the united states. what kind of leverage do you feel you have, and how many votes do you think that speaker can deliver to get this passed when ultimately a deal -- if a deal is crafted and is put forward? >> you know, i don't know the answer to that question, chris, how many votes the speaker has or can have. and i don't think he'll know, and we won't know, until in fact some sort of agreement is rea reached. and while the president has been talking to the speaker, he was speaking to us as well. we were all at a meeting today. we'll be back there on sunday trying to work towards assuring that we have a long-term plan that brings the debt down, gets the deficit down, and make sure that we have a country that pays its bills. i think those are the

objectives. i think they're pretty clear. i think everybody's going to have to come to the table and realize that they are going to have to be compromises made. we understand. in fact, we know that there are going to be cuts that are necessary. and discretionary spending and defense spending. we're going to look at entitlements, obviously. but the fact of the matter is that i think we ought to all be focused on making sure that america does not default on its bills, because if we do, we will adversely help -- hurt an already struggling economy. we will hurt individual consumers. we'll hurt every pensioner who has any money in the stock market. we're going to hurt the financial community. so that that is generally agreed i think by everybody in the room today as not an alternative that's acceptable. >> but if it's not acceptable, why do you have to negotiate? if everyone in the room agrees that you can't do that, right, then you should be able to just pass the debt ceiling.

this has been i think what has fl flum oxed people from the beginning. >> let me make a point. i made it clear and i believe that the democrats would vote overwhelmingly to make sure that america does not default on its bills, if that proposition were before us, and in fact a majority of democrats have already voted on that proposition, even on a bill that the republicans put on the floor clearly designed to fail, and every single one of them voted no. notwithstanding the fact that they know we need to meet our obligations and not default on our bills. so i said today again that democrats would clearly be ready to support such a piece of legislation. now, having said that, we want to see what -- if that's not put on the floor, we want to see what package is contemplated to be on the floor, and that's what we're talking about at the white house. clearly, there are some things that if first of all we're not

going to balance the budget or bring the deficit down on the backs of the most vulnerable in america. >> let me ask you about that question, because what's currently being -- and this is -- i know you have to go so i'll wrap this up. but what's currently being reported is a ratio of 85% on the spending side, 15% on the revenue side. i wonder, do you think that's fair? and if not, what is your conception of what a fair package would look like in terms of the balance between the two? >> look, i believe that the bowls simpson commission gave an excellent report. that doesn't mean i agree with everything they had in there nor did they expect everybody to agree to it. but they had about a 2 1/2 to one spending cuts to revenues ratio. they believed in a bipartisan fashion, and that was a reasonable ratio. 15 to 85 is not a reasonable ratio because what it means is that the wealthiest people in america are getting a big tax break, and the most vulnerable

people in america are being asked to pay the bill. that's not an american value. it's not the values that we share. and it's not a program that we would support. >> maryland congressman steny hoyer, democratic minority whip. thank you for your time tonight. really appreciate it. >> thank you. want to know one more thing that shows what a strange new era we're living in? remember this observation on election night? >> our debt ceiling is now $14.3 trillion. it will need to be raised in the coming year. >> back then, most everyone was wondering what the hell the debt ceiling was. we're happy to report tonight that the debt ceiling has reached a new pop culture height. it's now cool enough or nerdy enough to be parodied by photo shop. someone seriously awesome has started tracking the debt ceiling tracking a cat in a ceiling.

much more on this coming up, including warnings from president obama when it comes to cutting medicare and social security. howard dean will join me tonight. and later, the scandal that has forced rupert murdoch's company to kill one of its best-known tabloid newspapers. why they are quitting rather than fighting after a phone hacking scandal that has all of england buzzing. alone there's been a 67% spike in companies embracing the cloud-- big clouds, small ones, public, private, even hybrid. your data and apps must move easily and securely to reach many clouds, not just one. that's why the network that connects, protects, and lets your data move fearlessly through the clouds means more than ever. a lot of peo ple think fiber can a lot of do one thing and one thing only, and those people are what i like to call wrong. take metamucil. sure it helps you keep regular,

but it doesn't stop there. metamucil is the only leading fiber supplement with psyllium, which gels to help remove waste and reduce cholesterol. it can multi-multitask. it's so 2012. look at it! it's doing over a million different things right now. metamucil. ask more of your fiber.

what president obama called a very constructive meeting on the budget has some on the left using words like "harmful." how far would and should the administration go to get a deal? representative keith ellison and former governor howard dean join me with their reaction. and later, republican presidential candidate tim pawlenty wants to talk about serious business on the campaign trail, like his love of lady gaga. although polling indicates he is not in fact on the edge of glory. this ought to be good. ♪ ♪

♪ [ female announcer ] something unexpected to the world of multigrain... taste. ♪ delicious pringles multigrain. with a variety of flavors, multigrain pops with pringles. it's schwab at your fingertips wherever, whenever you want. one log in lets you monitor all of your balances and transfer between accounts, so your money can move as fast as you do. check out your portfolio, track the market with live updates. and execute trades anywhere and anytime the inspiration hits you. even deposit checks right from your phone. just take a picture, hit deposit and you're done. open an account today and put schwab mobile to work for you.

today republican senator orrin hatch voted against a nonbinding measure that simply said millionaires and billionaires should play a more meaningful role in reducing the nation's debt, after he argued that the nation's wealthy are already overburdened and said it's time for the poor and the middle class to step up to the plate. >> i hear how they are still caring for the poor and so forth. the poor need jobs. and they also need to share some of the responsibility. >> yeah. that's what we're dealing with here. millionaire senators who think

the poor and middle class have it too easy in this country. that's why social security, medicaid, and the rest of the social safety net are offered up for sacrifice. even though seven times as many americans rank jobs and the economy as the most important problem fate facing the country over the deficit, 57 53% to 7%. joining me is congressman keith ellison. congressman, do you are look around and think that you are in some sort of crazy bizarreo world? because to me, the conversation in washington is so detached from the immediate pressing need for jobs i don't even know where to begin. >> we had to break out of the beltway and go out to america. the progressive caucus is on a 12-city jobs tour. and so we've gone across the country, to milwaukee, detroit, minneapolis, and we have gone to new york city, we're going to have to miami, because we need to hear from the real folks.

one lady in minneapolis stood up and said she's a wal-mart employee, a manager, makes $9.80 an hour, no benefits and says she carries three cards in her pocket. one is her wal-mart i.d., the second her discount card, and the third is a welfare card, a card so that she can partake of the basic social safety net that wal-mart refuses to grant to her, even though she is a manager and even though she is a valued employee by them. you wouldn't know it by the pay they give her. so we've gotten outside of the beltway and we'll keep doing it. when i heard orrin hatch's statement today, i was quite frankly flabbergasted and amazed at how out of touch he must be. i mean, when is the last time this guy bagged a grocery or sat in a barbershop? doesn't he know that people are really suffering out there? they are in foreclosure. doesn't he know these things? everybody else seems to know. >> congressman, let me ask you about the social safety net.

obviously, house minority leader pelosi said that the caucus would not support cuts to medicare, social security. >> and medicaid add to that. >> that's interesting, because that's where i was going. when you start to think about those three programs, it seems to me like medicaid is the most politically vulnerable. >> right. >> how are you going to make sure that's not where the cuts end up going? >> by always telling people that medicaid is a part of this three -- this set of three that we're going to protect. social security, medicare, and medicaid. medicaid it's important to remember goes to help the health care needs of the poorest americans. it helps people stay in nursing homes. it helps people who are most vulnerable adults who have no health care, sometimes children's programs. it is a vitally important program for the poorest americans. and without it, they have nothing. nothing at all. and so i -- are these the people

who senator hatch thinks need to buck up and do more? are these the people he thinks are not doing their fair share? >> finally, since it's going to come down to a squeaker, i think, in the house, if and when there's a deal that's struck, it seems if you do the math, the progressive caucus is going to have genuine leverage here. and the reason is that they are going to need democratic votes to get this passed. will you pledge that you and your colleagues will not vote for a package that includes cuts to medicare, social security, and/or medicaid? >> yes. full stop. >> great. excellent. well, we got that on record. thank you so much for joining us tonight. >> yes, sir. take care. thank you. the white house attempts to drive both parties towards the mythic beast all of washington loves and seeks, a grand bargain. howard dean is here to talk about it. and later, is tim pawlenty hipper than we thought?

or is he just trying to get in good with the kids? wait until you hear pawlenty's pearls of wisdom about lady gaga. >> so, ah, your seat good? got the mirrors all adjusted? you can see everything ok? just stay off the freeways, all right? i don't want you going out on those yet. and leave your phone in your purse, i don't want you texting. >> daddy... ok! ok, here you go. be careful. >> thanks dad. >> and call me--but not while you're driving. we knew this day was coming. that's why we bought a subaru. even if you think your mattresses is just fine, ask me what it's like to get your best night's sleep every night. why not talk to someone who's sleeping on the most highly recommended bed in america.™

it's not a sealy or a simmons or a serta. ask me about my tempur-pedic. ask me how fast i fall asleep. these are actual tempur-pedic owners. ask someone you know. try your friends on facebook. you'll hear it all. unedited. ask me how it feels after 10 years. just ask me. there are over 4 million tempur-pedic owners, and they're more satisfied than owners of any traditional mattress brand. ask me why someone who's never had an ache or a pain is in love with this bed. start asking real owners. find out what you've been missing. right now, you can buy a tempur-pedic mattress set and save up to $200. plus, take advantage of our 4 years special financing. visit tempurpedic.com for full details on our mattress set savings event and 4 years special financing. don't wait-offer ends soon. visit tempurpedic.com now.

everybody acknowledged that there's going to be pain involved politically on all sides, but our biggest obligation is to make sure we're doing the right thing by the american people. >> that was the president today following budget negotiations,

his message to both parties to expect political pain. after the president's statement, press secretary carney provided some detail on where that pain might come from. >> savings has to come -- will have to come from discretionary spending, cuts in programs. in some cases, the democrats and the president will see is painful but necessary. cuts in defense spending. that are significant, but protect our national security. cuts in entitlement spending. savings that we can extract to reduce health care costs without putting the onus on seniors or the disabled. and cuts in tax spending. i should note here that the real pain is going to be felt by the people who receive the programs, and not just the democratic politicians who want to protect them. but of that list, the most politically painful measure for republicans is what press secretary carney creatively referred to as cuts in tax spending.

apparently the white house thinks if you cut the words "cuts" and "spending" in it, republicans might go for it. now joining me former governor of vermont and current cnbc contributor howard dean. >> chris, this is a fascinating time, isn't it? >> it sure is. let's get into this. the president apparently is seeking $4 trillion in cuts over the next decade. and everything to invoke the cliche is on the table, social security, medicare, medicaid. i wonder, are there ways to get to that number that -- and avoid genuine emiss ration for the poor and middle class? >> there are, actually. i'm actually pleased with what the president is doing. who knows if i'll be pleased at the end of the line. but this is the grand bargain that needs to be done. and he's persisting in trying to do this and saying i think properly no to the oh, let's just extend this for three weeks. there's nothing while we work it all out.

if you look at what -- look, boehner, i have a lot of respect for boehner. he is not the radical right-wing crack potulny section of his party. he is going to have to pass the 87 votes or whatever that the tea party has put in there, but he'll have to take some heat for it. but if you listen carefully to what they are saying, these are the outlines of a possible compromise. first of all, you do not more m medicaid, and social security. just find a different way to fund them. if you do that, you're going to get huge savings without cutting benefits. secondly, i thought carney was right on the money. i disagree with the republicans on taxes. it's foolish to have billionaires -- the average millionaire gets $138 million tax break right now. it's ridiculous. but this is a compromise. and the compromise is reduce what he creatively called tax spending. tax spending is the $53 billion the oil companies get from taxpayers.

and there's tons of other things like that. ethanol subsidies and all of these things. there's a long list of special interest tax breaks over the years. you throw those in, and with the defense department, you can get to where we need to go. >> can we zoom in for a second on medicare? then i want to get to medicaid. this is your area of expertise. they are talking about reducing the payments to the providers, specifically hospitals, if i understand. >> you don't have to do that. that will -- probably what's what they are talking about, and it's not the right where to go. if they want to take it out, go ahead. the only way you can ever control health care costs in this country is get rid of the perverse incentive we have to do as much as you can. if you regulate payments, people will figure out how to get around it by providing more service. you have to pay for health care the way kaiser pays for health care. give them a set amount, and this

is what you get. here are the benefits you have to provide for this. let them figure out how to do it. >> there was a landmark study of the effects of medicaid, attract 90,000 medicaid people eligible in oregon, only 10,000 receive it due to the state's lottery system. and the study found that enrolling in medicaid significantly improves the overall health and financial stability of low income americans and reduces the number of unpaid bills to health care providers. and yet medicaid seems to have nowhere obviously to -- to command nowhere near the political power of medicare or social security. do you worry about medicaid ending up -- >> i do. we use medicaid not just for poor people, but as the basis of our universal health care for kids under 18. which we've had for 20 years in vermont as a result of an expansion of medicaid. medicaid is a terrific program. it does have its faults. its biggest fault is underreimbursement. but it's a big program. and i would agree anecdotally

that in my experience the n.i.t. study is right. the problem with medicaid it doesn't have a lot of constituency, because not many politicians care about poor people. orrin hatch clearly thinks is the enemy. i don't know who thinks he take care of him at wal-mart the next time he shops or sends his staff to shop for him. and even the democrats don't have a high regard in some cases. i think keith certainly does. but the progressive caucus does. but there's a lot of democrats, you know, who care more about some of the fat cats that contribute from wall street than they do about poor people. they talk about poor people in a nicer way, but they don't have a big constituency. and medicaid is a very important system. but as it was pointed out, this is important for middle class people and health care providers. hospitals can't survive without a medicaid program. otherwise, they have to deliver that same care for nothing. >> we'll keep our eye on the medicaid ball as this develops.

howard dean, thank you so much for being here. >> my pleasure. coming up -- why is rupert murdoch trying to get away from reporters? even a fox news crew had to chase after him. because the scandal he's facing just brought an entire newspaper down and could send some of his top lieutenants to jail.

presidentialial candidates are first and foremost human beings. this fact is difficult to keep in mind as the campaign wears on and they robotically offer the same talking points. but i think it's probably a good thing not to dehumanize political opponents. so i bring you this piece of tape from the campaign trail, which i found kind of delightful. >> are you ready? >> ready. >> what's your favorite lady gaga song? >> that's easy. >> "glory." >> "paparazzi." >> oh, yeah. [ laughter ] >> yes, that's tim pawlenty, ex-governor of minnesota, and current candidate for the republican nomination.

a washington-based pop culture blogged snag the interview on the road in iowa. when asked his fafrvorite musicn of all time, he said bruce springsteen. but then mr. pawlenty exhibited a genuinely impressive knowledge of pop's most delightly bizarre icon. >> how about "born this way"? you like that? i have to say even though she is unusual, "born this way" has some appeal. she is actually very talented. at the end of the lady gaga hbo special, and you watch her sing a capella "born this way," she can sing. she can definitely sing. >> it isn't the first time he played the lady gaga card. at a young republicans event in iowa, he said the relationship between barack obama and the young voters was "bad romance." back in 1993, he supported minnesota's first in the nation

ban based on discrimination on sexual orientation and gender orientation. people couldn't be fired or defied housing for having been born this way. candidate pawlenty says now he regrets that vote. he also now supports a constitutional amendment to define marriage as only between a man and a woman, and he wants to reinstate don't ask don't tell. he says his views have evolved over time. maybe lady gaga would just say this. ♪ hey, hey ♪ there's nothing else i can say ♪ ♪ hey, hey ♪ i wish you never looked at me that way ♪ >> coming up -- when glenn beck was forced off fox news, it was merely the end of one tv show on a 24-hour cable network. that's nothing compared to what is happening to one of rupert

murdoch's other properties. has team murdock gone too far? a. ♪ machines have a voice. ♪ medical history follows you. it's the at&t network -- a network of possibilities... committed to delivering the most advanced mobile broadband experience to help move business... forward. ♪

[ male announcer ] the davis twins... ...are alike in nearly every way... ...right down to brushing their teeth. so how did only one get gingivitis? well, one in two people do. so i told karen about new crest pro-health clinical gum protection toothpaste. it helps eliminate plaque at the gumline, helping prevent gingivitis. it's even clinically proven to help reverse it in just 4 weeks. and it protects these other areas dentists check most. looks like the twins are even again. new crest pro-health clinical toothpaste.

life opens up when you do. after 168 years, the rupert murdoch empire announced today that the phone-hacking scandal-grabbing international headlines would be the undoing of british tabloid giant "news of the world." today, murdoch's son, james, told his staff this sunday's edition of the paper would be its last ever. the paper is accused of paying off police while hacking into the phones of celebrities, members of the royal family, a murdered teenager, victims of terrorism, and war widows for years. the scandal started back in 2005, when aides to the british royal family suspected the paper of eavesdropping on private conversations. in 2006, british police arrested one of the paper's reporters and a private investigator on conspiracy charges.

"news of the world" vowed an investigation, but contended it was the work of just a few bad apples. in 2007, andy collison, then editor of the paper, resigned and was then hired by british prime minister david cameron as director of communications. in the last few days, detailed emerged that the "news of the world" hacking wasn't a few isolated incidents and wasn't limited to celebrities and the royal family. the paper had hacked into the phone of millie dowler, a murdered british teenager, as well as the families of fallen british soldiers. british police now say they have uncovered nearly 4,000 hacking victims. 4,000. and even after making the unprecedented call to stop the presses forever,ed the murdoch family is protecting rebecca brooks, rupert murdoch's protege who was once editor of "news of

the world" and now heads up another division. >> i am satisfied that rebecca, her leadership of this business, and her standard of ethics, and her standard of conduct, throughout her career are very good. fundamentally, actions taken a number of years ago by certain individuals in what had been a good newsroom have breached the trust that the "news of the world" has with its readers, and we took the decision to close down the paper, to cease publication after this sunday, really because of that. >> rupert murdoch himself was in no mood to chat today, walking briskly to get away from reporters, including one of his own from fox business. as for those "news of the world" employees who were thrown under the proverbial bus, we do know what some of them did after work today.

a few hours later, robbie collin tweeted we are all getting drunk. archie, we're getting reports in "the new york times" and in your own paper that the journalists of the "news of the world" who are out of a job feel like they are being sacrificed all to protect rebecca brooks, who is of course murdoch's protege and was overseeing "news of the world" at the time most of this was going on. >> and they're completely right to feel that. most of the reporters there now weren't there at the time. the paper has cleaned house since those terrible days. that isn't really fair. the only really senior person still at "news international" associated with all of that in a way that anyone can detect is rebecca brooks, and she is the only person that is going to get away with this whole thing scott free. instead of one person being got rid of in a way that could have drawn a line under this, probably would have helped everyone to move on and think

about something else, it appears that the murdoch family will protect this person at the expense of 200 journalists all of whom will lose their jobs. it's an extraordinary story. >> it's also remarkable, reports today indicating that andy cowlson, and trying to keep the names straight, he was an editor before brooks and then david cameron hired him even after he was disgraced in the scandal, that he is set to be arrested tomorrow. is that what you're hearing? >> yeah, that's right. he was actually there after brooks. but on any other day, this would be the big story. the former -- or sorry, director of communications to the prime minister, basically the british cj from the west wing, will be arrested. it's an unbelievable story there. and it looks as if he'll be arrested. it's possible, although it's only alleged, he could face perjury charges and could very easily do prison time over this. >> there's been some speculation i read about the motivation behind shutting down "news of

the world." one of the columns i read today said they thought it was possible that this would be a way of essentially the murdoch empire destroying the evidence. that once they shut it down, they would not have to retain records of any sort. do you know if there are any police present in the building, or any legal injunctions offered to make sure that the evidence of how broadly this practice was being pursued doesn't vanish? >> well, i have actually seen the same piece you're talking about. i have also seen a bit of pessimism over whether or not that would be possible under british law, and i'm not enough of an expert to tell you. but there is no police present right now. but what is clear that news international in the past has done a lot to cover up the ef evidence of all of this. it went to india to persuade the company that ran the service there to delete stuff, which the company refused to do. more recently, news international has decided the

only way to get through this thing is to get it all out there. i hope now that the evidence will all come out. whether it will definitively link rebecca brooks to something either she must have known about or she was utterly imcompetent at her job, that's unknown and hard to answer. >> archie bland, walking us through the ongoing scandal in london. thanks so much. really appreciate it. >> no problem. what does this mean for the man who has always stayed one step ahead when controversy swirled around his newsrooms? the crisis that is shaking rupert murdoch's empire to its core is coming up. ♪ [ tires screeching ] ♪ if it can survive this drive... ♪ it can survive yours. the nissan altima. innovation that lasts. innovation for all.

♪ with other top companies. with an esurance quote, you know you're getting a great deal. you can thank our tech team for that. sure, i'll let them know. bye-bye. aha! anything you want to share? with the tech team? oh, i'm dating that girl in accounting. seriously? yeah, we're pretty serious. [ female announcer ] know if you're getting a great deal.

see for yourself at esurance. technology when you want it. people when you don't. coming up -- rupert murdoch has never been afraid of risk in the name of profit, until now. what does it say about murdoch that he is willing to kill off a newspaper that was actually making money? $30 million in profit last year alone. a look at where the hacking scandal leaves murdoch now. introducing the schwab mobile app. it's schwab at your fingertips wherever, whenever you want. one log in lets you monitor all of your balances and transfer between accounts, so your money can move as fast as you do. check out your portfolio, track the market with live updates. and execute trades anywhere and anytime the inspiration hits you.

even deposit checks right from your phone. just take a picture, hit deposit and you're done. open an account today and put schwab mobile to work for you.

good, strong news can by disclosing things, can help shape the agenda. >> have you shaped that agenda tat the all in terms of

perception or in terms of how the war is viewed? >> no, i didn't think so. i mean, we tried. [ laughter ] >> there you have it. rupert murdoch in his own words on how business is done at newscorp. so it really should come as no surprise that controversy surrounding the media giant on a regular basis. damage control is a near constant in murdoch's various media holdings. after a litany of indecency fines and claims of anti-business practices. remember when glenn beck said this about president obama? >> this president i think has exposed himself as a guy over and over again who has a deep-seeded hatred for white people or the white culture. i don't know what it is. this guy is, i believe, a racist. >> that clip still drives me crazy every time i see it. after those 2009 comments, advertisers boycotted beck's program.

murdoch was unaffected and even defended his comments. >> i think it was something that perhaps shouldn't have been said about the president. but if you actually assess what he was talking about, he was right. >> of course, just this past february, the glaring headline "fox news chief roger ailes urged employee to lie, records show." of course that was in reference to uncovered lawsuit documents that said that judith regan was encouraged to lie to federal investigators. nothing ever came of the claim, but newscorp did they regan $10.7 million in a wrongful termination suit settlement in 2007 what is the latest scandal involving "news of the world" paper? is this a scandal that could take murdoch under? joining me now is the senior adviser to media matters for america. great to have you on. >> great to be here, chris. thanks. >> elyse, you wrote a piece

today about why americans should care about the scandal, and it's a good question. batting this around today, there is a question of does this affect us here, or is it fun to gawk at? why should we care? >> we should care because murdoch enjoys undue influence over u.s. media. and one of the things i think we need to learn is not to wait until the entire public is shocked by hacking allegations into a dead child's voicemail, before we actually start asking the questions about where the lies, the decent, and the covering up ends. the people most responsible for this tend to get promoted. you've got les hinton, who was actually rebecca brooks' boss at "news of the world," who led the first investigation into the misdoings there, found, surprisingly, that he thought nothing wrong was going on, and then was elevated to be ceo of dow jones, which now runs the "wall street journal."

the tentacles of the murdoch empire reach deep into the u.s. and, you know, the lies are clearly established on fox news. you know, the question is whether we're going to learn from what the brits have been through, whether we're going to wait that long to raise the questions. in our country. and whether the brits are going to learn from us and make sure that he doesn't aggregate more power over there until we get to the bottom of this. >> speaking of aggregating more power, the largest step forward for murdoch and his empire is acquisition of sky news, one of the largest networks over in england, and currently they are making a bid to purchase it fully. what do you think this will do or what do you think this portends for the possibility of that takeover? >> well, i mean, you have to start back a year ago when they initially made the bid, which they expected to be rubber stamped by the regulators over there, amid fears that the phone hacking scandal was going to grow, amid concerns about

murdoch ever getting power, amid concern about foxification of their airwaves over there. the deal has already been delayed for a year at great expense. $2.5 billion already to newscorp shareholders. and then just today, it was announced that even though it was expected to be approved today iss today, it's been moved to september. which a good step, but not enough. it needs to be referred to a place where the citizens have input into whether murdoch has more control over media there like he does here. >> we ran through in the opening a number of scandals that have erupted in various murdoch holdings, and he always seems to sort of come away from it and come out kind of laughing at it all. do you think there's a corner turned here? what separates this? why is this different? are we going on six months from now fox news is going to continue being fox news and he's going to continue building this crazy multinational empire? >> well, i mean, i think a corner has been turned in a couple of different ways. first of all, rupert murdoch is

80 years old. all of this is actually setting up his legacy. and this is just a terrible note to go out on. in decisiaddition, he set up ja murdoch to be heir to the throne, who had been promoted not that long ago amidst the scandal, moved to new york. some say because he needed to get out of the way of what everybody knew was going to boil over in terms of rage of the uk about the "news of the world" scandal. and the question is actually whether murdoch's legacy can survive this, and whether his son has a sincere intention to bring "news of the world" and newscorp international into the next century, and actually behave like a corporate citizen that puts public welfare and quite honestly shareholder concerns above their personal and political agenda. >> finally, i wanted to ask you, a lot of people are now looking at the way the rest of the

british media treated the scandal in the beginning and kind of pooh poohed it or sort of tacitly sort of winked and nodded at what "news of the world" was doing. do you think there's an analogue in the way that the mainstream press treats fox news, and if this could be a wake-up call in that respect? >> i mean, it's really a great point, chris, because there is sort of this sense that fox news just does what it does, and you either believe it or you don't. but rarely do we hear the mainstream media actually talk about the systemic deceit, bigotry, and hatred that goes all through that network, where you've got the managing editor in washington, d.c., tying our president to socialism, even when he admits that it's far-fetched. and this is a pattern of mismanagement at newscorp international that we need to pay attention to in the u.s. right now. >> elyse hoge, thanks so much for joining us tonight.